Released in late 2017, Essence has produced a nice table-top book on The Obama years at the White House.
Quilt – courtesy of the Bordeaux Collection
news with a perspective you can trust
This section provides content of product reviews, event review and those where opinions are required.
Released in late 2017, Essence has produced a nice table-top book on The Obama years at the White House.
Quilt – courtesy of the Bordeaux Collection
Here is the Nespresso Coffee Machine by Breville.
This machine is fantastic and transforms even the motley coffee enthusiast such as myself into a professional barista.
The price ranges from $200-$250 but after you so some simple math you will see the benefit as for some you will see an immediate saving over what you are paying for your brew.
[Leimert Park, CA] Known as the cultural heartbeat of the African-American community Leimert Park was full of energy as SONY Pictures, the African-American Film Critics Association and the Urban Issues Forum hosted a symposium and discussion on the upcoming movie Roman J. Israel, esg. Last night a standing room only crowd squeezed in the iconic Regency West supper club to hear first hand why this movie is a must-see.
“You have lots of great civil rights attorney’s but they are not the same as civil rights activist.” Jasmyne Cannick.
Led by AAFCA president Gil Robertson the panel was allowed to stretch out and gave great examples of current day activism in Los Angeles. The panelists were social critic and political commentator Jasmyne Cannick; the film’s director and producer Dan Gilroy; Professor of African-American studies and noted historian of activism in Los Angeles, Dr. Anthony Samad and noted community activist attorney Nana Gyamfi.
Asked about what motivated him to create the film, director Gilroy stated he is a “child of the 60’s” who grew up in a very liberal-minded family. He noted the impact of the civil rights movement and how he came to appreciate the activist attorney’s who worked during that period even up until now. “The issues never stop,” mentioned Gilroy. He spoke how the character portrayed in the movie had a unique personality and once he showed the screen play to lead actor Denzel Washington the rest is history. Washington played a critical role in developing the film and once the movie “Fences” was completed he gave his full energy in helping Gilroy bring the movie to the big screen. Screening is set with a special engagement on November 17th in Los Angeles and New York.
The film is set in Los Angeles during the ’70’s and is one you will enjoy. Coincidently, coming out of the civil rights movement many students moving on to college were motivated to study law. A good crop were led to become proficient as “people’s law” attorney’s with the aspiration to bring justice to all of those who were underserved or victims of the criminal justice system. Like the movie character Israel, they weren’t the most flashy in appearance but were extraordinary in understanding the law and how it could benefit the clients who sought them out. Israel’s character also reminds you of the work such as James Bell who has built a stellar legal career dealing with the injustices of youth.
Ta-Nehisi Coates “We Were Eight Years in Power – An American Tragedy” is a must read for those who desire to stay informed in our current environment.
“We Were Eight Years in Power” showcases Coates’ voice who is a Gen X’r but offers credible perspectives as seen through the African-American lens, or at least from those such as his. The book weaves eight essays and demonstrates a new thought of how our world is changing. The notion of Barack Obama running for president, let alone thinking he could get elected seemed like a lark, if not an impossible reality to so many. Yet, people like Coates and later generations such as millennial’s write with pride as Obama defied the odds to become President and successfully completed two terms. Starting as a Blogger, Coates joined the team at the Atlantic and in a short period has taken off.
The content of the book takes you on a journey of historic reality. Some may be troubled from how Coates portrays racism and how it has shaped our culture. He admits there has been progress but while so many dismiss the gains as we are “so better off,” his point is to remind you of the vestiges created from the notion of using race as a benchmark.
Regardless of whether you agree with some of Coates perspectives or not, the book is chalk-full of personal examples and other documented facts which allow you to better appreciate his writing style. He is unapologetic and reminds you how African-American’s have risen to tremendous levels of success, despite the barriers of how life is conducted in the United States.
Through his credibility as a journalist/writer he was given the opportunity to be in the company of Barack Obama. The first meeting morphed into a relationship where then president Obama invited him to the White House for more robust discussion centered around race and progress. Coates writes how much he treasured the invite and subsequent relationship.
The chapter “My President is Black” came from an essay which received international acclaim. Despite your feelings of Barack Obama, Coates allows you to better understand the rise and how he and first lady Michelle took the notion of being the first African-American president with pride and conducted themselves impeccably.
As this review is being written, Coates is concluding his book tour. Also, the recent elections of November 7, 2017 which brought a solid rebuke to Donald Trump, his politics and the rhetoric he spews is a point Coates makes, still in disbelief the voting public elected him as the 45th president is very interesting. The book references this point with a unique twist. Coates brings it home by helping the reader understand the dilemma and pressures Obama had to contend while, while Trump with just the reality of being a “white man” desiring to be president never had to deal with the continuousness. His primary issue was brought on by his own actions, not from systemic racism.
Coates admits not trying to be a “voice” for people or causes, but through his writing and how he has penned this book you quickly are thought to elevate him to a credible voice, which will be prominent for years to come.
The book which is a tad under 400 pages is a quick read. The good news is each chapter is its own separate essay and does a very good job of referencing how Coates saw things during the eight years of Barack Obama’s presidency. It is a worthy investment for your library, especially if part of your frequent communication is on politics and race, and you truly desire a different perspective.
[Los Angeles, CA] The movie “Marshall” is set for release this weekend. I was fortunate to be in attendance with some of my BPG (Black Professional Group) colleagues as they hosted an advance screening Wednesday, October 11th.
The life of Thurgood Marshall has been chronicled in the annals of contemporary history. However as iconic as his legal career was and his subsequent place as a justice on the Supreme Court, there is much about him the public does not know. The two most recent books of his life do a good job in presenting his career; Thurgood Marshall: American Revolutionary written by Juan Williams (2000) and Showdown, written by Wil Haygood (2015).
“Marshall” the movie does a good job of showcasing his brilliance of our legal system. It is not a documentary but more of a bio-pic. Therefore, it does take creative license in presenting a very entertaining movie. Certain scenes take me back to “Native Son” as race and sex are center stage. You have a black chauffeur accused of raping a white woman, whom he worked for. We have seen this plot before. As a young attorney Marshall was part of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund so he was summoned to represent the chauffeur who claimed to be falsely accused.
nouninformalnoun: biopic; plural noun: biopics; noun: bio-pic; plural noun: bio-pics
- a biographical movie.
Through twist and turns of dealing with sheer racism and a system which automatically assumed those accused, especially if they were black (African-American) were guilty, Marshall used his gift to motivate and convince the lead attorney they could turn the system to their favor while seeking to exonerate their client.
If you know about Justice Thurgood Marshall, you will score the film high. However, if you are not aware of his career or the plight of blacks during that period, you will miss the sensitivities and may provide a lower grade. My grade comes in at a solid 7, and after some reflection I could see moving it up to an 8 because it covered so much ground.
The cast is very contemporary but at the end you are treated to three people who make a cameo appearance which make you appreciate the struggle of working through the legal system in trying to achieve justice.
On Tuesday, October 10th the National Museum of African-American History and Culture in Washington, DC also had a special screening. Those in attendance were treated to a post question and answer conducted by Wil Haygood (The Butler) as he interviewed the director, Reginald Hudlin. There are many poignant comments during the 32-minute session, including how not one U.S. company was willing to fund the project. The usual excuse of the film not having a broad audience was the reason Hudlin shared. How many times have we heard that only to see such movies take on worldwide interest? Hudlin’s work was eventually realized as Chinese investors stepped forward.
Question and Answer with director
Here is the official trailer
It just so happened last week my daughter reminded me the Dramatics were on “Unsung.” Those of you who may be unfamiliar with Unsung may do yourself a favor as it is a television program which chronicles the life of African-American entertainers. It provides a snapshot of how they started, how they reached fame and for many how they stumbled and eventually fell. Then for the lucky few, it shows how they got back up and live (or lived) a productive life. I quickly turned it on and almost forgot the group started in Detroit.
Coincidently, the movie “Detroit” came out yesterday, so having a little free time I decided to go solo and check it out. After watching the movie and upon leaving to try to catch up with Lanie, my initial rating was a 7 on a scale of 1 – 10. However, after some serious reflection and in fairness I increased my rating to a 8.
Not a documentary
It is not a documentary but a portrayal of a real life story; the Detroit Riots of 1967. However, more important the plot or key storyline focuses on the horrific incident and overt law enforcement brutality lashed out at those who were staying at the Algier’s Motel. Notice, I mentioned law enforcement as during the riots that cadre included the local police, the state police and the national guard.
Contrary to what some believe, folk who live in a community and subsequently unleash their frustration resulting in a “riot” and where damage is done to their immediate area do so not out of stupidity……..but from years of frustration, oppression, public policy and other factors that reach a boiling point.
The black migration to the industrialized north
As a historian I really appreciated the opening of how the black migration from the south to the industrial north occurred. More important it focused on the construct of racism and how the strategy of white flight occurred. As blacks were achieving civil rights gains which allowed more movement, those whites who fled urban cores found a new haven in the newly created “suburbs” As they left resources went with them. The core plea of blacks seeking integration was not a basic attempt to “be white” or transition to a “white lifestyle.” Instead it was the demand for whites to integrate the resources, the power and the responsibilities.
Many are steeped with denial in justifying why them and their families left various areas. The bottom line centers on race so you don’t have to be a history major to understand why and how this became a popular practice in communities such as Detroit and many places in the United States where blacks were moving in to try to benefit from the economic uplift made possible by the “industrial revolution.”
The white flight dynamic or fleecing communities phenomenon reminds me of a great parallel Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. delivered at the last sermon he would preach, which was Sunday, April 1, 1968, “It’s alright to tell a man to lift himself by his own bootstraps but it is a cruel jest to say to a bootless man that he ought to lift himself by his own bootstraps!”
The film allows you to see the reaction created from the riots. The backdrop will take additional studying for you to fully grasp the theme.
Fast forward to 1967 and the many dreams deferred as those blacks who moved in did not experience the paradise they expected. Instead they were marginalized and many dreams were cut short. Worse, the very police departments who had a “protect and serve” protocol transitioned their behavior to an occupied-like force, thus fueling much distrust and anger from community folk.
The raid which was the focus of the riot was the type of incident which was quite common. As a matter of fact, the police didn’t expect anything to get out of hand. Instead this time it did and the community responded with anger and the frustration boiled over to start the outburst which lit the flame for the riots.
The director is to be commended for having the courage to tackle the subject. Although the movie is a bit lengthy, I would suspect that is because there is so much ground to cover. Also, and a key point so you are clear is the movie is not a documentary so there is some creative license such as the ’72 bug being featured in a scene which was supposed to reflect 1967. Also, there are numerous questions you are left to ponder. Why did the person who shot the starting pistol run? Why didn’t those who knew he shot the pistol simply fess up to avoid the subsequent harassment, brutality and for some death which they suffered?
Yet, even in 2017, you can see some of the same behavior carried out by law enforcement embraced today. No doubt police are needed for public safety. Bad people do prey on good communities to wreak havoc and carry out their destruction . Yet the movie speaks to attitudes. If relates how you can experience sheer discrimination and hostility of people simply because they are different from institutions designed to help people lead a productive life. The denial, the cover-up and the brazen nature of those who simply lack basic respect for humanity is seen.
Fiction is fiction but this is a movie which hopefully inspires candid discussion. It is a movie featuring many black actors portraying a critical incident in the black community, but the movie can’t be relegated as a movie just for blacks ? It is a movie all should take the time to see as it is not about “police-bashing” but it portrays the environment of how things were and unfortunately there is pain. Some don’t want to be reminded of what happened. Then for others it rips the scab off of a wound which was thought to have healed.
More can be found here.
If you found the movie Detroit interesting and you seriously would like to have more facts I recommend two solid sources.
Eyes on the Prize is the seminal documented source which chronicles black life during that period. The series is split into sections. In addition to footage there is also a companion book.
The book – The book lends about 30 pages to the Detroit issue. It is packed with eye-witnesses and serves as an excellent source.
The footage. American Playhouse rebroadcast the Eyes on the Prize series and the good news is their clips are available via youtube. Here is the specific clip which features Detroit (about 33 minutes into the footage).
Postscript – I am lucky to take up residence in what is referred to the “inner city” or “urban area.” The good news is we have choices so especially for movies such as “Detroit” I started to just trek the three miles downtown to the Regal theater. Luckily I came to my senses and headed to the Rave theater in the Crenshaw community. I was pleased to see the movie theater packed. More important it was full of folk who are a bit older than me who more than likely lived during the period of the Movie, as they probably were in their early teens or early twenties. The reason this is important is to experience the visceral reaction from the various scenes communicated in the call/response found in audiences that are predominantly black. Some might find the reaction irritating or “why don’t they shut up” but it’s that reaction which helps you truly understand what the director is attempting to show you.